Health and Wellness Atlas

How The Body Thrives
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme

Switch Atlas

The Inner World

The Civil World

The Natural World

Health and Wellness Atlas

Disputed Statements

Claims this atlas currently marks as unsettled or as tested and found false. A debated fact is one scholars hold competing positions on; a debunked one has been checked against the record and found not to hold. Both are kept in view rather than quietly smoothed over, with the reasoning that put each one where it stands.

3 statements marked Debated.

Dietary Goals for the United States (McGovern Report), DescriptionIn January 1977, after hearings on the national diet, the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs, chaired by Senator George McGovern, issued Dietary Goals for the United States, nutritional guidelines urging Americans to eat less fat, less cholesterol, less refined and processed sugar, and more complex carbohydrates and fiber, aimed at leading causes of death including heart disease, certain cancers and stroke. The committee's eat-less recommendations triggered strong pushback from the cattle, dairy, egg and sugar industries and from the American Medical Association. Under that pressure the committee issued a revised set of guidelines later in 1977 that adjusted the advice on salt and cholesterol and watered down the wording on meat consumption, an early example of the pattern this atlas records honestly elsewhere: dietary fat and cholesterol guidance has shifted repeatedly as evidence and pressure evolved, rather than settling once.

Dietary Goals for the United States (McGovern Report), Milestones

Standing

Concerns Description

Currently States In January 1977, after hearings on the national diet, the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs, chaired by Senator George McGovern, issued Dietary Goals for the United States, nutritional guidelines urging Americans to eat less fat, less cholesterol, less refined and processed sugar, and more complex carbohydrates and fiber, aimed at leading causes of death including heart disease, certain cancers and stroke. The committee's eat-less recommendations triggered strong pushback from the cattle, dairy, egg and sugar industries and from the American Medical Association. Under that pressure the committee issued a revised set of guidelines later in 1977 that adjusted the advice on salt and cholesterol and watered down the wording on meat consumption, an early example of the pattern this atlas records honestly elsewhere: dietary fat and cholesterol guidance has shifted repeatedly as evidence and pressure evolved, rather than settling once.

Genuinely contested on the science, not only the politics already described above: the American Medical Association warned in 1977 that the evidence for universal dietary goals was not conclusive, and a 2015 systematic review of the era's own randomized controlled trials (Harcombe et al., Open Heart) found they did not support the fat-reduction recommendation. See the linked open question.

Source Wikipedia: United States Senate Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs

Publication of The Modern Rise of Population, DescriptionIn 1976 Thomas McKeown published The Modern Rise of Population, synthesizing twenty years of argument that the historic decline in mortality in industrializing Britain owed more to rising nutrition and living standards than to medicine or targeted public health measures. The book provoked instant disagreement from demographers. Later historians, notably Simon Szreter, argued McKeown had understated the contribution of public health infrastructure such as water supply, sewage systems, housing improvement and vaccination. This atlas records the disagreement as open rather than settled; see the linked open question.

Publication of The Modern Rise of Population, Milestones

Standing

Concerns Description

Currently States In 1976 Thomas McKeown published The Modern Rise of Population, synthesizing twenty years of argument that the historic decline in mortality in industrializing Britain owed more to rising nutrition and living standards than to medicine or targeted public health measures. The book provoked instant disagreement from demographers. Later historians, notably Simon Szreter, argued McKeown had understated the contribution of public health infrastructure such as water supply, sewage systems, housing improvement and vaccination. This atlas records the disagreement as open rather than settled; see the linked open question.

Genuinely contested among historians of medicine: Szreter's 1988 reanalysis of McKeown's own mortality data found methodological errors (confusing tuberculosis, bronchitis and pneumonia deaths) that understated public health's contribution. Recorded debated per this atlas's own DataBrief, not resolved by either side.

Source Wikipedia: Thomas McKeown

Quality-Adjusted Life Year, DescriptionThe quality-adjusted life year (QALY) is a generic measure of disease burden that combines the quality and the quantity of life lived into one number: one QALY equals one year lived in perfect health, calculated by multiplying the change in health utility a treatment produces by the duration of that effect, on a scale running from 1 (perfect health) to 0 (dead). The idea grew across several contributors, from Klarman and colleagues in 1968 through Fanshel and Bush in 1970 and Torrance and colleagues in 1972, with Joseph Pliskin's 1974 Harvard doctoral thesis carrying the first known mention of QALYs by that name and a 1976 article by Zeckhauser and Shepard giving the term its first appearance in print. Disability-rights advocates have criticized the measure because an otherwise healthy person can never return to full health or reach a high QALY score from an already-impaired baseline, a concern sharpened wherever a health system, such as the United Kingdom's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence since 1999, uses a pound-or-dollar-per-QALY threshold to decide which treatments it will fund.

Quality-Adjusted Life Year, Concepts

Standing

Concerns Description

Currently States The quality-adjusted life year (QALY) is a generic measure of disease burden that combines the quality and the quantity of life lived into one number: one QALY equals one year lived in perfect health, calculated by multiplying the change in health utility a treatment produces by the duration of that effect, on a scale running from 1 (perfect health) to 0 (dead). The idea grew across several contributors, from Klarman and colleagues in 1968 through Fanshel and Bush in 1970 and Torrance and colleagues in 1972, with Joseph Pliskin's 1974 Harvard doctoral thesis carrying the first known mention of QALYs by that name and a 1976 article by Zeckhauser and Shepard giving the term its first appearance in print. Disability-rights advocates have criticized the measure because an otherwise healthy person can never return to full health or reach a high QALY score from an already-impaired baseline, a concern sharpened wherever a health system, such as the United Kingdom's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence since 1999, uses a pound-or-dollar-per-QALY threshold to decide which treatments it will fund.

The measure itself, its formula and its history are settled; what is genuinely debated is whether using it to allocate scarce health resources is fair to people with disabilities. See the linked open question and dissent for both sides.

Source Wikipedia: Quality-Adjusted Life Year